zizek has a different way of counting things: he counts them as instances-without-classes
this is also how social media works: through instances-without-classes
if we can agree on these, maybe we can also agree on the mathematical formulation of this way of counting:
cumulative occurence distribution = birikimsel oluş taksimi
look carefully into any anti-zizek discourse
you’ll see that it is equal to its own cynicist existence
zizek’s knowledge consists of common complexes. in each situation, zizek induces a “most relevant” chain of discourse from these complexes.
each chain starts from the periphery, collecting common instances, and then goes towards the heart of the question in a roundabout way.
this is a movement both (1) to produce the current chain, (2) to “update” the knowledge of complexes
if such a discourse is “unacceptable”, the listener will replace the “you” in the discourse with “zizek” and make it into an anti-zizek discourse.
anti-zizek discourses that resonate stronger with the listeners’ superego will be more likely to insist.
as a result, anti-zizek discourses make up a statistical index for a society.